“If we don’t follow the law, what good is it?”Ĭomplaints filed against the oversight panel by Boulder residents John Neslage and Emily Reynolds allege Sweeney-Miran’s social media posts show she is biased against police and her participation in the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado’s lawsuit against the city over its treatment of people who are homeless represents a conflict of interest. “My heartfelt concern over past instances of police violence, and that I am open to alternatives to police responses when force is not needed, does not make me biased - it makes me the sort of thoughtful person who is intended to be on Boulder’s Police Oversight Panel,” she said on Twitter. Sweeney-Miran refused and insists she hasn’t done anything wrong. The selection committee and the council previously reaffirmed the decision to impanel Sweeney-Miran, but an outside investigator last month recommended she resign. The City Council will weigh whether having opinions on police reform counts as bias and should disqualify someone from participating on a panel tasked with improving the Boulder Police Department. The vote follows a $20,000 investigation into complaints filed by Boulder residents that the group that selected Sweeney-Miran failed to properly consider her advocacy for police reform and involvement in a lawsuit against the city for forcibly removing tents from people experiencing homelessness. That’s the question the Boulder City Council will consider Thursday when it decides whether to remove Lisa Sweeney-Miran from the city’s Police Oversight Panel. Should a community leader who has advocated for reallocating tax money away from law enforcement and said officers can’t be trusted serve on a police oversight panel? Lisa Sweeney-Miran (Photo via Boulder Valley School District) Information gathered will be used solely to assist the Board in understanding the effects of policy and program operations on Americans' civil liberties.Digital Replica Edition Home Page Close Menu The Board is unable to respond to individual comments and cannot assist individual redress requests. While there is no specific deadline for the submission, the Board is interested in receiving public comments soon. Comments may be forwarded via the Board's Web site at. The Board seeks any comments, suggestions or other information from members of the public who have knowledge on this subject. Efforts to address, enhance, conform, and potentially streamline these procedures are ongoing throughout the Federal Government, and the Board is assisting relevant executive branch departments and agencies in those efforts. Processes currently exist to redress errors and ameliorate false positives associated with the use of watch list data for aviation and other security screening purposes. ![]() This includes advising on whether adequate guidelines, supervision, and oversight exist to protect the important legal rights of all Americans. 108-458, December 17, 2004), advises the President and other senior executive branch officials to ensure that concerns about privacy and civil liberties are appropriately considered in the implementation of laws, regulations, and executive branch policies related to efforts to protect the Nation against terrorism. The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, established by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Pub.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |